Where is the Press? Porn Star’s Accusations of Decade-Old Affair Overshadow $84 Million Clinton Scandal

Kirsters Baish| Anyone who doesn’t think that the mainstream media is strategically trying to sabotage the Trump presidency, needs to think again. The left uses just about any story to ruin things for Trump. They’ve drawn out the entire Trump/Russia collusion narrative so long that even they’re sick of talking about it. Now, the Stormy Daniels story is taking over the headlines. But, the mainstream media is ignoring one major story lurking in the shadows.

It seems that for every real news story, there are ten more bashing Trump’s politics or his personality. We are no strangers to media bias. Hell, over 90 percent of Trump’s campaign coverage was portrayed in a negative light. 96 percent of media campaign contributions went to none other than Hillary Clinton.

What’s even worse than a group of press that is openly partisan? When the press ignores an extremely important and relevant story based on political ideology, that is irresponsible. Former CEO of the left leaning National Public Radio, Ken Stern, explained that the liberal media usually hides stories that “don’t reflect their interests or beliefs.”

The most recent example of the horrific way that the mainstream media handles what stories they report on is actually more of an example of a story they did not report on. That story is the one of Hillary Clinton’s $84 million campaign finance scandal. You’ve probably never heard about it, and that is the issue.

Western Journal reports:

The liberal media is so preoccupied with Stormy Daniels — and an alleged $130,000 Federal Election Commission reporting issue — that they’re willfully ignoring an ongoing federal investigation into Clinton’s fundraising practices.

That scandal, which has appeared for months almost entirely in conservative media, involves $84 million in allegedly excessive six-figure contributions laundered through the Hillary Victory Fund, dozens of Democratic state parties, Democratic National Committee and ultimately to Clinton’s campaign.

Last December, the Committee to Defend the President filed a complaint with the FEC, documenting “an unprecedented, massive, nationwide multi-million dollar conspiracy.” The 101-page complaint is built entirely on FEC reports filed by Democrats, memos authored by Clinton campaign manager Robbie Mook and public statements from former DNC chairwoman Donna Brazile and others.

The FEC would not act on the complaint during the 120-day timeframe. Then, the committee sued the FEC in order to force them into action. They claimed that the FEC’s failure to act is “arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, and an abuse of discretion.”

This is singlehandedly the biggest campaign finance scandal that our country has ever seen. If you need to put it into perspective, look at conservative filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza. He was prosecuted and convicted. He served eight months in a community confinement center. He had five years of probation. This was all for a similar campaign finance violation. Only D’Souza’s violation totaled $20,000 in straw man contributions.

Why is it that the media covered D’Souza’s story so closely, but they haven’t reported squat on Clinton?

Hillary Clinton’s campaign is being accused of four times the amount than D’Souza was accused of. If that’s not proof that the mainstream media is rigged, I don’t know what is.